Category Archives: Keyboard

Relive the ’80s with the Korg Volca FM synthesizer

Synths are great. You push a key, turn a few knobs and suddenly you're making "music." So when keyboard maker Korg realized it had a hit with its low-cost, entry-level Monotron series, it was only natural to follow it up with something that had a lit…

Dangerous Golf requires PC players to use a controller

Welp, looks like I won’t be needing this for my games anymore.

We’re looking forward to spending some time with Dangerous Golf, the destruction-focused, ball-bouncing “simulation” that just launched on PC, Xbox One, and PS4 courtesy of some veteran developers from Burnout Paradise-maker Criterion Games. Still, we’re a little surprised by a prominent missing feature from the PC version. As the game’s Steam page now notes quite prominently, “Dangerous Golf requires a controller to play.”

A lack of keyboard and/or mouse support is more than just a rarity in PC games; it’s practically unheard of. Even when games are specifically designed for a handheld controller on another platform, the PC port usually offers some sort of option for the two input methods that have been standard on practically every home PC for the past two or three decades. Console games that would be functionally impossible to control or feel incredibly compromised without a controller (EA’s Skate series comes to mind) usually just don’t end up with PC ports in the first place.

Aside from some recent virtual reality games (which might as well be considered a separate platform), the only PC game we can think of that officially requires a controller is Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons (players report there is some basic, barely functional keyboard support anyway). That game was explicitly designed to use a console controller’s dual analog sticks to allow for simultaneous, separate control of two protagonists. It would at the very least be extremely awkward to control without those sticks. Dangerous Golf, on the other hand, could probably have implemented the same basic keyboard/mouse-based control scheme that dozens of other PC golf games has used for decades without too much trouble.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Google hovers over delete button for backspace nav shortcut in Chrome

(credit: ElbridgeGerry)

Google looks set to abolish a feature that allows users to navigate to the previous page by hitting the backspace key, after complaints piled up against the option.

However, it would seem that a small number of users will be very unhappy with the planned change.

The subtle tweak can apparently be seen in Chrome 52, which is currently only available as an unstable “Developer” version.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Google’s iOS keyboard is the GIF and emoji app of my dreams

I just deleted the Giphy app from my iPhone. This is notable because I adore GIFs. I find a deep, slightly perverse, pleasure in sending texts full of those little moving pictures to my loved ones, and the Giphy app streamlined my image-hunting proce…

Report: Google is building an iOS keyboard

The Google Keyboard for Android.

A report from The Verge claims that Google is working on a third-party keyboard for iOS. The site says the keyboard would include “a variety of search options,” a description that suggests it will be more than a copy of Google’s Android keyboard.

According to the report, the keyboard has “been in development for months” and is “visually distinct” from Google’s Android keyboard. The usual Android Google Keyboard features are here, like gesture typing, but on iOS you’ll be able to “tap the Google logo” to jump to traditional Web search. The report says there are “distinct buttons for pictures and GIF searches,” all apparently designed to push users to do more Google Searches.

Apple added support for third-party keyboards in iOS 8, and since then we’ve seen the usual Android keyboard developers bring over their work. Companies like Swype, Swiftkey, and Fleksy made the jump, and now Google is following suit.

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

BlackBerry’s Priv Android phone comes to Verizon

For power Android users who need a physical keyboard, one of the few devices left is the BlackBerry Priv. Until now, it could only be found on AT&T and T-Mobile, but it's now available on Verizon, the biggest network in the US — for a price. Whi…

How Casio accidentally started reggae’s digital revolution

Looking at the Casio Casiotone MT40, you'd be forgiven for thinking it was an unremarkable keyboard. You may even have owned one just like it. Launched in 1981, the cream machine came with 37 keys, 22 different instrument sounds, six onboard rhythms…

Stretchable square of rubber doubles as a keyboard

There's a whole branch of science that's dedicated to turning flexible surfaces into sensors that can be used as an artificial substitute for skin. These materials could then be used to give robots a sense of touch, or even to restore feeling for peo…

Gaming Software Showdown: Logitech Gaming vs. Razer Synapse

Gaming Software Showdown: Logitech Gaming vs. Razer Synapse

Logitech and Razer both have some pretty awesome gaming peripherals. Whether you’re playing games or getting real work done, they’re both great options. The software they use have some small, but important differences. Here’s how they stack up against each other.

Both Logitech and Razer have a wide array of gaming peripherals to choose from, and we’re not going to suggest any particular models in this post. Instead, we want to know about the capability of the software as a whole. During our testing, we used the Logitech G410 keyboard and G602 mouse, as well as the Razer Blackwidow Chroma Tournament Edition keyboard and Naga Epic Chroma mouse. While there’s a lot we could say about specific models and such, today we’re going to talk about something no one really reviews—their software, and how easy it is to customize your gear with macros, profiles, and even lighting.

The Contenders

Both Logitech and Razer use a single application to manage all of your peripherals at once. In most ways, they’re pretty similar. However, they both have very slightly different ways of handling their tasks that leave the choice between them largely up to personal preference. We’ll get to that in a bit. For now, here’s what we’re looking at:

  • Logitech Gaming Software: Logitech’s application is named with all the creativity of an above-average brick. Fortunately, the company spent more time on features than it did on naming its software.
  • Razer Synapse: Razer’s app, Synapse, looks pretty dang cool. The company even has an account system that you can use to log in and sync your profiles between multiple computers. Handy if you don’t want to keep setting it up on new machines.

Both apps perform most of the same key functions, including programming buttons on your peripherals, recording macros, customizing the color scheme, and recording usage statistics. The way they go about each task can be very different, though. Keep in mind as we review that neither way is necessarily wrong. We’ll explain how each one differs and you can decide for yourself which platform is best for you.

Keyboard Shortcuts and Profiles

Logitech and Razer allow you to customize special macro keys so you can quickly perform complicated actions. Both allow you to set up multiple profiles, as well, so you can customize your buttons on a per-application basis. For example, you can make a button on your mouse open a new tab while you’re in Chrome, or punch some guy in the face while you’re in Mass Effect. Both will automatically switch based on which application is in focus at the time. However, each piece of software handles this a bit differently.

When you create a Logitech profile for an application, that profile is used across all your Logitech devices. So, say you create a Skyrim profile for your keyboard, your mouse will also have a Skyrim profile, based on a default blank profile, with no customizations until you deliberately change it. Razer, on the other hand, requires you to set up a Skyrim profile for your keyboard and mouse separately. If you only set up a Skyrim profile for your keyboard, your mouse will use whatever profile it last auto-detected.

In practice, I found this could cause some problems. For example, I have a Chrome profile on both the mouse and keyboard that I use for productive things like opening a calculator or entering a block of text for work. If I only set up a Skyrim profile for my Razer keyboard, and the last program I opened (or alt-tabbed to) was Chrome, my Razer mouse would still have my Chrome shortcuts bound to it. Accidentally launching the calculator application is not ideal while I’m fighting a dragon. Worse yet, if Chrome wasn’t the last application I alt-tabbed to, the mouse might be using an entirely different profile. This could make it very hard to know what a particular button is going to do unless you customize it specifically.

With Logitech, if I only set up a Skyrim profile for my keyboard, the mouse would disable the Chrome profile while I was in the game, and use the default shortcuts instead. These were usually more harmless shortcuts like displaying my mouse’s battery level or pressing a number key. More importantly, it was consistent. If I only set up a few keyboard shortcuts on a profile, I didn’t have to worry that a button might be bound to a complex macro from some profile associated with a different application that I’d forgotten about.

There are a few other differences I noticed as well:

  • In general, Logitech’s better at general purpose features, while Razer focuses on options a user might like while in-game. For example, with Logitech you can have a button paste a large block of text, play or pause media that’s currently running, and even mute or unmute your microphone in Ventrilo. Razer, on the other hand, has fewer functions for dealing with outside applications, but it does have options for switching profiles on the fly, customizing shortcuts while in a game, and communicating with its other devices. If you want to use your peripherals for the office as well as games, Logitech probably has the upper hand here.
  • Logitech’s interface is slightly easier to use. The app will show you an image of your device, with the buttons you can customize glowing. Just click on the buttons you want to change to edit the shortcuts. Razer, on the other hand, requires you to manually change which “view” you’re facing to edit all of the available buttons. It’s only a mild annoyance, but it’s jarring nonetheless.
  • Logitech allows you to choose either software-based profiles, or to store profiles on the device itself. So, if you store a profile on your mouse’s memory and plug it into a different computer, it will remember your customizations. Unfortunately, you can only store a limited number of profiles on a certain device. While Razer used to allow storing profiles on devices, newer hardware uses an account-based syncing option. You can sync more profiles this way, but it involves using a third-party server that may not always be active down the road.

The differences between Razer and Logitech on this front were largely cosmetic. Personally, I’ve used Logitech’s software more, so I found Razer’s interface a bit more confusing, but not catastrophically so. This is probably a result of me having used Logitech’s app longer. In both cases, there’s a bit of a learning curve, so which one you choose doesn’t really matter.

The only exception is the profile switching issue. Your needs may be different than mine, so I won’t say one is definitely better than the other, but it’s important to understand how both platforms handle profiles. Logitech assumes you want the same profile active across all devices at all times, while Razer allows (or, more accurately, requires) you to specifically create a profile for each application on each device.

Recording Macros

Manually customizing your keys is nice, but sometimes you need to perform an action that’s too long or complex to create by hand. That’s where recording macros comes in handy. You can just hit the record button, press the keys you need in the correct order, and then save that action for later. You can then assign that action to a specific button later.

If you’ve ever played an MMO, you know how awesome this can be. My mage in World of Warcraft can stop casting, switch targets, remove a curse, and get back to the current target at the press of a button. It’s also handy for work. As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, I use macros to do routine tasks like add photo credits or tags regularly.

In my experience, Logitech’s interface for saving macros was a bit more straightforward. On the screen where you assign commands to buttons, there’s a small, searchable sub-window called “Commands.” Here, you can create new macros before you even assign them to a button. Then, drag them to the key you want to use to trigger that Command. Everything is in one place and it’s super easy to use.

In contrast, Razer Synapse has a few more steps involved. First, you need to create macros in a separate tab of the application. Then, you have to go back to the key assignment screen, click the button you want to assign, choose “Macro” from a drop down list of options, and then choose the name of a macro you created from the list. It’s a lot more steps for something so simple.

When it comes to on-the-fly recording, Logitech is once again slightly simpler than Razer, but only if you have certain hardware. Some keyboards have a dedicated Macro Recording button (or “MR”). You can simply press this button, then press one of the programmable keys. This will begin the recording. Perform the action you want to save and, when you’re done, click the MR button again. That action is now saved on your keyboard. You don’t even need to touch the application.

Razer instead uses a Fn-style button (like you find on most laptops) to trigger on-the-fly recording. The keyboard I tested had an “M” symbol on the F9 key. By pressing Fn+F9, you can start recording a macro. When you’re finished, press Fn+F9 again, then press the button you want to save that action to. It’s slightly more cumbersome than having a dedicated macro recording button, but it does also save space on the keyboard, so you don’t necessarily need to buy hardware with a dedicated button to get the feature.

Both platforms also handle macro repeating slightly different. Logitech allows you to set several repeat options (like repeating while pressed, or repeating while toggled) on macros when creating the macros themselves. For example, you may want one button to reload your gun every five seconds until you say to stop, but a different button should reload your gun every five seconds for one minute. With Logitech’s platform, you’d have to create two separate macros for this. However, Razer only makes you choose a repeat option when assigning a macro to a key. So, you could create a macro to reload a gun. When you assign it to a button, make one button repeat every five seconds until you disable the toggle, and make the other button repeat it for one minute. This gives Razer a bit more flexibility.

Razer also has an option to repeat a macro a specified number of times, which Logitech does not. Both Logitech and Razer can repeat a macro as long as the assigned key is pressed, as well as repeating the macro forever, using the assigned key as a toggle to turn the macro on and off. This gives Razer another advantage in creating macros.

There’s very little difference between how Logitech and Razer handle their macros, but depending on your use cases, the slight differences could mean a substantial change to your gameplay or workflow. If you need macros that you can repeat a specific number of times, Razer is much better. If you need to create a large list of macros you can easily search, Logitech is going to be more your speed.

Lighting and Colors

Gaming Software Showdown: Logitech Gaming vs. Razer Synapse

Are light-up keyboards with customizable color schemes functionally pointless? Yes. Are they badass? Also, yes. Logitech and Razer both have gorgeous hardware, so customizing the color scheme to suit your style makes a lot of sense. However, color options vary greatly from product to product. Some peripherals can only change the lighting colors of the device as a whole, while others can change colors on a per-key basis, which is even cooler.

Understandably, the hardware with the most customization options are also the most expensive. We’ll look at the differences in how each platform handles coloring, but keep in mind not all devices will have all of the features described here. That being said, here are some of the key differences:

  • On supported devices, Logitech makes it super easy to customize the color of each individual key on your keyboard. Just click a color in the color picker, then click the keys you want to change. The keyboard updates in real time. You can also choose from a selection of pre-programmed effects like the entire device cycling between colors, or a rainbow wave across your keyboard that looks trippy as hell. Some devices may come with more limited options. Logitech also has a feature called “lighting zones.” You can group keys together (like WASD or the number keys) and change their colors as a group, based on which game profile you’re in.
  • Razer uses a separate app called the Chroma Configurator to customize the lighting scheme of its peripherals. This makes it a lot more powerful, but also a lot more complex. You can customize the keys individually, or add effects like color waves, rainbows, and ripple animations. If you really want to get fancy, though, you can add layered effects. So, for example, you can choose a few keys to stay static (like WASD or the F and J home keys), while everything else has a fancy animated rainbow effect. I have to admit, in testing this looked cool as all hell, but also got a little distracting. If you like colors, though, Razer has a bit more to offer.

On pure color customization power, Razer wins, but both platforms are pretty stellar. Personally, I think there’s a limit to how much color customization I really want to do. On my own keyboard, I use a mostly blue color scheme, with a few important keys highlighted so I can find them more easily in my peripheral vision. I don’t need a rainbow effect that ripples outward from every key I press. However, for those who like to trick their hardware out, both are pretty awesome.

The Winner: It’s All About Your Preferences

If you’re looking into gaming peripherals, you probably have some pretty specific needs. Fortunately, Logitech and Razer have pretty comparable feature sets. It’s the minor details that can be the determining factor in your preference. For example, in my case, I need commands where I can easily paste blocks of text, sometimes using non-standard characters, I want on-the-fly macro recording with dedicated buttons, and I create a library of macros I can search later. For me, Logitech is the clear choice. If you want a bit more colorful flair from your hardware, prefer to finely tune shortcut profiles per device, or want to sync your profiles between devices, Razer is what you want. Ultimately, it all comes down to preference and both are awesome options.

Gaming Software Showdown: Logitech Gaming vs. Razer Synapse

Gaming Software Showdown: Logitech Gaming vs. Razer Synapse

Logitech and Razer both have some pretty awesome gaming peripherals. Whether you’re playing games or getting real work done, they’re both great options. The software they use have some small, but important differences. Here’s how they stack up against each other.

Both Logitech and Razer have a wide array of gaming peripherals to choose from, and we’re not going to suggest any particular models in this post. Instead, we want to know about the capability of the software as a whole. During our testing, we used the Logitech G410 keyboard and G602 mouse, as well as the Razer Blackwidow Chroma Tournament Edition keyboard and Naga Epic Chroma mouse. While there’s a lot we could say about specific models and such, today we’re going to talk about something no one really reviews—their software, and how easy it is to customize your gear with macros, profiles, and even lighting.

The Contenders

Both Logitech and Razer use a single application to manage all of your peripherals at once. In most ways, they’re pretty similar. However, they both have very slightly different ways of handling their tasks that leave the choice between them largely up to personal preference. We’ll get to that in a bit. For now, here’s what we’re looking at:

  • Logitech Gaming Software: Logitech’s application is named with all the creativity of an above-average brick. Fortunately, the company spent more time on features than it did on naming its software.
  • Razer Synapse: Razer’s app, Synapse, looks pretty dang cool. The company even has an account system that you can use to log in and sync your profiles between multiple computers. Handy if you don’t want to keep setting it up on new machines.

Both apps perform most of the same key functions, including programming buttons on your peripherals, recording macros, customizing the color scheme, and recording usage statistics. The way they go about each task can be very different, though. Keep in mind as we review that neither way is necessarily wrong. We’ll explain how each one differs and you can decide for yourself which platform is best for you.

Keyboard Shortcuts and Profiles

Logitech and Razer allow you to customize special macro keys so you can quickly perform complicated actions. Both allow you to set up multiple profiles, as well, so you can customize your buttons on a per-application basis. For example, you can make a button on your mouse open a new tab while you’re in Chrome, or punch some guy in the face while you’re in Mass Effect. Both will automatically switch based on which application is in focus at the time. However, each piece of software handles this a bit differently.

When you create a Logitech profile for an application, that profile is used across all your Logitech devices. So, say you create a Skyrim profile for your keyboard, your mouse will also have a Skyrim profile, based on a default blank profile, with no customizations until you deliberately change it. Razer, on the other hand, requires you to set up a Skyrim profile for your keyboard and mouse separately. If you only set up a Skyrim profile for your keyboard, your mouse will use whatever profile it last auto-detected.

In practice, I found this could cause some problems. For example, I have a Chrome profile on both the mouse and keyboard that I use for productive things like opening a calculator or entering a block of text for work. If I only set up a Skyrim profile for my Razer keyboard, and the last program I opened (or alt-tabbed to) was Chrome, my Razer mouse would still have my Chrome shortcuts bound to it. Accidentally launching the calculator application is not ideal while I’m fighting a dragon. Worse yet, if Chrome wasn’t the last application I alt-tabbed to, the mouse might be using an entirely different profile. This could make it very hard to know what a particular button is going to do unless you customize it specifically.

With Logitech, if I only set up a Skyrim profile for my keyboard, the mouse would disable the Chrome profile while I was in the game, and use the default shortcuts instead. These were usually more harmless shortcuts like displaying my mouse’s battery level or pressing a number key. More importantly, it was consistent. If I only set up a few keyboard shortcuts on a profile, I didn’t have to worry that a button might be bound to a complex macro from some profile associated with a different application that I’d forgotten about.

There are a few other differences I noticed as well:

  • In general, Logitech’s better at general purpose features, while Razer focuses on options a user might like while in-game. For example, with Logitech you can have a button paste a large block of text, play or pause media that’s currently running, and even mute or unmute your microphone in Ventrilo. Razer, on the other hand, has fewer functions for dealing with outside applications, but it does have options for switching profiles on the fly, customizing shortcuts while in a game, and communicating with its other devices. If you want to use your peripherals for the office as well as games, Logitech probably has the upper hand here.
  • Logitech’s interface is slightly easier to use. The app will show you an image of your device, with the buttons you can customize glowing. Just click on the buttons you want to change to edit the shortcuts. Razer, on the other hand, requires you to manually change which “view” you’re facing to edit all of the available buttons. It’s only a mild annoyance, but it’s jarring nonetheless.
  • Logitech allows you to choose either software-based profiles, or to store profiles on the device itself. So, if you store a profile on your mouse’s memory and plug it into a different computer, it will remember your customizations. Unfortunately, you can only store a limited number of profiles on a certain device. While Razer used to allow storing profiles on devices, newer hardware uses an account-based syncing option. You can sync more profiles this way, but it involves using a third-party server that may not always be active down the road.

The differences between Razer and Logitech on this front were largely cosmetic. Personally, I’ve used Logitech’s software more, so I found Razer’s interface a bit more confusing, but not catastrophically so. This is probably a result of me having used Logitech’s app longer. In both cases, there’s a bit of a learning curve, so which one you choose doesn’t really matter.

The only exception is the profile switching issue. Your needs may be different than mine, so I won’t say one is definitely better than the other, but it’s important to understand how both platforms handle profiles. Logitech assumes you want the same profile active across all devices at all times, while Razer allows (or, more accurately, requires) you to specifically create a profile for each application on each device.

Recording Macros

Manually customizing your keys is nice, but sometimes you need to perform an action that’s too long or complex to create by hand. That’s where recording macros comes in handy. You can just hit the record button, press the keys you need in the correct order, and then save that action for later. You can then assign that action to a specific button later.

If you’ve ever played an MMO, you know how awesome this can be. My mage in World of Warcraft can stop casting, switch targets, remove a curse, and get back to the current target at the press of a button. It’s also handy for work. As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, I use macros to do routine tasks like add photo credits or tags regularly.

In my experience, Logitech’s interface for saving macros was a bit more straightforward. On the screen where you assign commands to buttons, there’s a small, searchable sub-window called “Commands.” Here, you can create new macros before you even assign them to a button. Then, drag them to the key you want to use to trigger that Command. Everything is in one place and it’s super easy to use.

In contrast, Razer Synapse has a few more steps involved. First, you need to create macros in a separate tab of the application. Then, you have to go back to the key assignment screen, click the button you want to assign, choose “Macro” from a drop down list of options, and then choose the name of a macro you created from the list. It’s a lot more steps for something so simple.

When it comes to on-the-fly recording, Logitech is once again slightly simpler than Razer, but only if you have certain hardware. Some keyboards have a dedicated Macro Recording button (or “MR”). You can simply press this button, then press one of the programmable keys. This will begin the recording. Perform the action you want to save and, when you’re done, click the MR button again. That action is now saved on your keyboard. You don’t even need to touch the application.

Razer instead uses a Fn-style button (like you find on most laptops) to trigger on-the-fly recording. The keyboard I tested had an “M” symbol on the F9 key. By pressing Fn+F9, you can start recording a macro. When you’re finished, press Fn+F9 again, then press the button you want to save that action to. It’s slightly more cumbersome than having a dedicated macro recording button, but it does also save space on the keyboard, so you don’t necessarily need to buy hardware with a dedicated button to get the feature.

Both platforms also handle macro repeating slightly different. Logitech allows you to set several repeat options (like repeating while pressed, or repeating while toggled) on macros when creating the macros themselves. For example, you may want one button to reload your gun every five seconds until you say to stop, but a different button should reload your gun every five seconds for one minute. With Logitech’s platform, you’d have to create two separate macros for this. However, Razer only makes you choose a repeat option when assigning a macro to a key. So, you could create a macro to reload a gun. When you assign it to a button, make one button repeat every five seconds until you disable the toggle, and make the other button repeat it for one minute. This gives Razer a bit more flexibility.

Razer also has an option to repeat a macro a specified number of times, which Logitech does not. Both Logitech and Razer can repeat a macro as long as the assigned key is pressed, as well as repeating the macro forever, using the assigned key as a toggle to turn the macro on and off. This gives Razer another advantage in creating macros.

There’s very little difference between how Logitech and Razer handle their macros, but depending on your use cases, the slight differences could mean a substantial change to your gameplay or workflow. If you need macros that you can repeat a specific number of times, Razer is much better. If you need to create a large list of macros you can easily search, Logitech is going to be more your speed.

Lighting and Colors

Gaming Software Showdown: Logitech Gaming vs. Razer Synapse

Are light-up keyboards with customizable color schemes functionally pointless? Yes. Are they badass? Also, yes. Logitech and Razer both have gorgeous hardware, so customizing the color scheme to suit your style makes a lot of sense. However, color options vary greatly from product to product. Some peripherals can only change the lighting colors of the device as a whole, while others can change colors on a per-key basis, which is even cooler.

Understandably, the hardware with the most customization options are also the most expensive. We’ll look at the differences in how each platform handles coloring, but keep in mind not all devices will have all of the features described here. That being said, here are some of the key differences:

  • On supported devices, Logitech makes it super easy to customize the color of each individual key on your keyboard. Just click a color in the color picker, then click the keys you want to change. The keyboard updates in real time. You can also choose from a selection of pre-programmed effects like the entire device cycling between colors, or a rainbow wave across your keyboard that looks trippy as hell. Some devices may come with more limited options. Logitech also has a feature called “lighting zones.” You can group keys together (like WASD or the number keys) and change their colors as a group, based on which game profile you’re in.
  • Razer uses a separate app called the Chroma Configurator to customize the lighting scheme of its peripherals. This makes it a lot more powerful, but also a lot more complex. You can customize the keys individually, or add effects like color waves, rainbows, and ripple animations. If you really want to get fancy, though, you can add layered effects. So, for example, you can choose a few keys to stay static (like WASD or the F and J home keys), while everything else has a fancy animated rainbow effect. I have to admit, in testing this looked cool as all hell, but also got a little distracting. If you like colors, though, Razer has a bit more to offer.

On pure color customization power, Razer wins, but both platforms are pretty stellar. Personally, I think there’s a limit to how much color customization I really want to do. On my own keyboard, I use a mostly blue color scheme, with a few important keys highlighted so I can find them more easily in my peripheral vision. I don’t need a rainbow effect that ripples outward from every key I press. However, for those who like to trick their hardware out, both are pretty awesome.

The Winner: It’s All About Your Preferences

If you’re looking into gaming peripherals, you probably have some pretty specific needs. Fortunately, Logitech and Razer have pretty comparable feature sets. It’s the minor details that can be the determining factor in your preference. For example, in my case, I need commands where I can easily paste blocks of text, sometimes using non-standard characters, I want on-the-fly macro recording with dedicated buttons, and I create a library of macros I can search later. For me, Logitech is the clear choice. If you want a bit more colorful flair from your hardware, prefer to finely tune shortcut profiles per device, or want to sync your profiles between devices, Razer is what you want. Ultimately, it all comes down to preference and both are awesome options.